RAW vs JPEG

  1. A RAW file will typically be two to six times larger than a JPEG file. RAW files are larger than JPEG files because they contain far more image data. All of the info is compressed into a smaller file size that’s easier to share in a JPEG image.

2. The fundamental distinction between RAW and JPEG is that RAW can carry more information than JPEG. In a nutshell, RAW is a larger, uncompressed file, whereas JPEG is a smaller, compressed file. Shooting in raw format gives you additional options in post-production, especially when it comes to white balance correction. It’s nearly impossible to edit a photo that was shot as a JPEG with an incorrect white balance.

3. Yes, you can convert your RAW to JPEG once your photos have been converted, however because you’re changing to a lossy format, the quality will suffer. Converting a RAW file to a JPEG implies condensing the details into a significantly lower file size, allowing you to store image data in less space.

4. I believe it would have to depend on the event you’re photographing; for example, if you have to photograph a fast-moving subject, I wouldn’t recommend utilizing RAW. Also, if you were shooting a wedding, it could be ideal to shoot in RAW because it ensures that you capture as many colors as possible in an image, resulting in photographs with a greater color range and depth.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *